Chicago Window Expert
Nobody knows more about windows.
-
Jun21
Test Your Mettle at Construction Research Lab
Filed under: About windows & glass, architecture, building design, Construction defects, Expert witness, Exterior facade consultant, Testing windows and glass, The Construction Process; Tagged as: building enclosure consultant, Building envelope consultant, construction research, dynamic water test, laboratory test, Laboratory testing curtainwalls, Laboratory testing glass, Laboratory testing windows, mockup testing, window consultant, window leaks, window testing20 CommentsMark Meshulam is an expert witness and exterior facade consultant located in Chicago, IL, USA
This article, originally written in 2006 is being reprinted here in very fond memory of my friend A.A. Sakhnovsky, lovingly known as “Sak”, who passed away on Fathers Day, June 19. He was about 85 years old.
The Construction Research Laboratory is an amazing, one-of-a-kind place located in a gritty, industrial area of Miami. Since 1975, companies like mine (Builders Architectural) have built and tested portions of buildings (usually windows and large walls of glass called curtainwalls”) at this world-renowned facility.

Left: test chamber awaiting its next victim. Right: curtainwall mockup being readied for a challenging battery of tests
After testing is complete, the actual building will be built “for real” almost anywhere in the world, utilizing knowledge learned here. The process is called building and testing a “mockup”, and sometimes these mockups can be 40 feet wide and 60 feet tall!World-famous proprietor A.A. Sakhnovsky – Sak to most everybody – though clearly no spring chicken, unstoppably shuttles between numerous mockups.
Sak directs his able crews in the construction, deconstruction and configuration of all manners of custom-made testing chambers, the large reinforced steel and concrete boxes upon which mockups are built. In addition, he schedules a staggering array of testing procedures, as each project uniquely requires.
From the Palmetto Expressway just North of the 74th Avenue exit, you can see the lab off to the West. From the random outcroppings of structural steel, you immediately assumes the site to be unrepaired devastation from the most recent hurricane.Looking closer, however, you notice that the steel has an odd appearance. Some pieces old, some new. It is more of a patchwork quilt made of conglomerated hunks of steel, wood and concrete. The vintage steel has been used, reused, and used again. It has been cut, moved, welded, cut, drilled, sealed, cut apart, craned and bolted. It has seen searing Florida sun, torrential rainfalls, and uncountable tests.
Now about the tests…
A typical test sequence for a prominent building in Chicago would list as follows:- Air Infiltration
- Static Water Penetration
- Dynamic Water Penetration
- Uniform Load Deflection
- Retesting of Air and Water
- Structural Overload
A brief explanation of each will be worth your while. Remember that each mockup is sealed to a reinforced steel box. This allows the lab to use big blowers to force air into or out of the chamber and apply powerful forces to the test specimen.
Air Infiltration

The first step in an air infiltration test is to mask off the "specimen" - that's the assembly you intend to test - and measure the airflow through the chamber. This allows you to isolate the air infiltration attributable to the specimen.
In this test, lab personnel pump air from the chamber with a blower while measuring the amount of air being removed while maintaining test pressure, often 6.24 psf (pounds per square foot), the equivalent of a 50 mph wind. Using plastic film sequentially removed, the lab determines how much air is passing through each element of the mockup. Air tests can be harbingers of results to come, so we participants tend to hold our breaths awaiting the outcome.
Static Water Penetration

A spray rack is used to apply hurricane-volumes of water to the test specimen while blowers are used to create a negative pressure on the inside. If the specimen sucks in uncontrolled water, the test is a fail, and that sucks because the testing cannot proceed until the leak is diagnosed and fixed.
The lab removes air from the chamber to achieve test pressure while dousing the mockup with hundreds of gallons of water delivered by large spray racks. Witnesses (such as myself) are inside the chamber with flashlights and scuba tanks (kidding) looking for leaks.
The test runs for 15 very long minutes. Drowning during this test is infrequent, however heat exhaustion is a distinct possibility because the chamber air conditioner often fights a losing battle against a baking Miami sun.
Dynamic Water Penetration

In the dynamic water test, an airplane engine is used to propel a barrage of water spray against the specimen. The violent buffeting action of the air blast has been known to shake the dentures out of witnesses inside the chamber
Same spray rack, also 15 minutes. This time the pressure comes from a very large airplane engine which roars to life with an explosion of smoke and oil, and rattles the bejeesus out of the specimen and the witnesses inside. When this test takes place, about a third of the lab must run for cover and those of us inside the chamber have plenty of time to mentally review our estate planning.
Uniform Load Deflection

These are just a few of the many gauges used to measure deflection of every part of the specimen while it is being subjected to wind loads far greater than anything the building will see in its future service life.
Lab personnel attach an impressive array of dial indicators on various parts of the specimen, then chamber pressure is cranked up. The indicators record the amount of deflection(bending) which occurs. Yes, glass does indeed bend, Virginia, but it also breaks. Therefore standing near the mockup during this test without a suit of armor is discouraged.
Retesting Air and Water
According to Sak, 95% of test specimens fail their first water test. According to me, diagnosing and fixing the leaks can take many frustrating days.You might imagine the foreboding we feel when re-entering the chamber for a water test after our windows have been bent like a banana during the deflection test. We might as well cancel any return flights for the immediate future.
Structural Overload
This test is similar to the Uniform Load Deflection test, except that the pressures are increased by an additional 50%. Any permanent bending or breakage would constitute a failure. Usually somewhere around this point in the sequence, participants have the suicide hotline on speed dial.Test Anxiety
Surviving the testing program is only one source of test anxiety. Usually the manufacturer forgets to send something, and invariably it is the very first thing you need to install. Then you forget to bring an important tool and bravely tangle with insane, lawless Miami traffic (the original inspiration for “bump-em cars”) to procure a hot crescent wrench from a local kid in a very white tee shirt.Then a storm blows through and drenches everything you were just about to caulk. Then you get a nasty sunburn on the top of your head which creates dandruff the size of corn flakes. Then you get the runs from an unfamiliar delicacy served from the “roach coach” which followed cramps from drinking a mug of colata (you learn later the locals drink the concentrated coffee delight in thimbles). Then a huge Palmetto bug, a mutant cockroach the size of a small poodle saunters confidently by, knowing full well it could whup you and your buddies. Then you look down and notice you are standing in a puddle of water crawling with questionable electrical cords while welding sparks fly at your head from out of nowhere, which you couldn’t hear because the noise is deafening.
An Awesome Experience

But with all the adversity, Sak’s place is truly loved by almost all who enter its creaking chain-link gates. It is a last rugged outpost of American individualism and in-the-trenches know-how. The vibe is one of fun, laughter, and comeradery forged in a nihilistic caulderon of absurdity.When we arrive, we feel a great sense of freedom and excitement. When things get tough, we wonder if we will ever escape. But for most, myself included, a stint at Sak’s place will become one of the most cherished experiences of our professional careers.

Mark Meshulam, Chicago Window Expert testing, and being tested, at Sak's Construction Research Laboratory.
Need window or curtainwall testing?
Most Popular Posts
- My Windows Leak!: 45 comment(s) | 17134 view(s)
- Window Glazing Leaks: 19 comment(s) | 7660 view(s)
- Aluminum Window Leaks: 8 comment(s) | 4612 view(s)
- Leaks and Problems with Vinyl Windows: 10 comment(s) | 4166 view(s)
- Preparing for a Window Leak Survey: 2 comment(s) | 3199 view(s)
- Diagnosing Glass Breakage: 24 comment(s) | 3161 view(s)
- Annealed, Heat Strengthened, Tempered and Insulated Glass: 7 comment(s) | 3098 view(s)
- Window Condensation: Top 10 Fixes: 10 comment(s) | 2952 view(s)
- Window Sealant Failure: 17 comment(s) | 2934 view(s)
- Insulated Glass Seal Failure: 17 comment(s) | 1815 view(s)
- Testing Leaking Brick Walls: 16 comment(s) | 1684 view(s)
- Bill Baker of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP: Tall Buildings and the Burj Khalifa: 4 comment(s) | 1618 view(s)
- The Symbolic Value of Buildings: 2 comment(s) | 1431 view(s)
- Leaks Through Split Face Block: 6 comment(s) | 1326 view(s)
- The Lowdown on Low-E Glass: 3 comment(s) | 1284 view(s)
- An Interview with Viracon: 4 comment(s) | 1218 view(s)
- Curtainwall Leaks: 6 comment(s) | 1179 view(s)
- Historic Window Renovation: 9 comment(s) | 1158 view(s)
- Wood Window Leaks: 2 comment(s) | 1148 view(s)
- Designing Buildings for the Very Windy City: 11 comment(s) | 1042 view(s)
- Chicago Energy Conservation Code for Dummies: 8 comment(s) | 1018 view(s)
- Window Repair or Window Replacement?: 7 comment(s) | 993 view(s)
- An Interview with Guardian: 4 comment(s) | 968 view(s)
- Field Museum Window Replacement: 2 comment(s) | 884 view(s)
- Welcome to Chicago Window Expert: 4 comment(s) | 874 view(s)
- The Future of Windows: 5 comment(s) | 836 view(s)
- Fixing Window Leaks in Tall Buildings: 4 comment(s) | 807 view(s)
- An Interview with Historic Mike Jackson: 2 comment(s) | 772 view(s)
- Thermal Images of Insulated Glass Types: 2 comment(s) | 733 view(s)
- Leaks and Mold in Walls: the dirty little secret: 1 comment(s) | 720 view(s)
- 2009 Web Statistics Revealed!: 4 comment(s) | 615 view(s)
- The Dynamic Water Test: 3 comment(s) | 602 view(s)
- Wynning in Glass Vegas: 3 comment(s) | 573 view(s)
- Deadly Falls from Windows: Preventable?: 16 comment(s) | 470 view(s)
- Test Your Mettle at Construction Research Lab: 20 comment(s) | 442 view(s)
- Does Chicago Code Require Low-E Glass?: 5 comment(s) | 441 view(s)
- Creating a Leak Survey Form: 4 comment(s) | 420 view(s)
- Choosing a Window Consultant or Exterior Building Consultant: 1 comment(s) | 416 view(s)
- Storm Damage to Windows and Glass: 0 comment(s) | 404 view(s)
- Legal Claims and Disputes in Construction: 0 comment(s) | 372 view(s)
- Performing Window Survey: 0 comment(s) | 342 view(s)
- Documentary Photos for Curtainwall Survey: 0 comment(s) | 316 view(s)
- Chicago Window Expert Goes Solar: 8 comment(s) | 306 view(s)
- An Interview with PPG: 1 comment(s) | 306 view(s)
- Fine Tuning Low-E Glass: 1 comment(s) | 268 view(s)
- Low-E Glass for Cooling Loads: 2 comment(s) | 259 view(s)
- News from the Green Front: 3 comment(s) | 235 view(s)
- Documentary Photos for Window Survey: 0 comment(s) | 229 view(s)
- Drowning Worms? An Olympic Eulogy: 0 comment(s) | 227 view(s)
- Keying for Window Leak Survey: 0 comment(s) | 226 view(s)





Share or LIke us!